Charlotte Lin
The experiences of slavery portrayed by Harriet Jacobs in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl and Booker T. Washington’s Up from Slavery are distinctly unique, and in some aspects, incomparable in facets that stem from expectations in society as a woman versus a man. Washington’s writing depicted his main sufferings as unequal opportunities, specifically in education. There was a presence of laborious exploitation and people who took advantage of him; however, he never felt fears quite like Jacobs’, and he stated that one of the worst parts of his slave life was wearing painful clothing. Washington never had to worry about being sexually abused or having his body exploited in ways that women commonly faced. Although this was not the case for all men, both during slavery and modern-day society, women are constantly more targeted and subject to sexual violence, which brings a whole other level of trauma and abuse. Even though the two authors lived at separate times and experienced the slave system a bit differently, we can compare significantly impactful elements of slavery experiences that would only be linked to views revolving around gender constructs. This information is not to minimize the trials of male slavery, as there were also other expectations of men that were not required of women. However, it is still important to realize the differences and the lasting impacts of gender roles in society, represented through years of slavery.
Men were often assigned to do heavier labor duties and valued for their physical strength. As seen in Washington’s book, this proved to put the young boy at a disadvantage due to his smaller physique. On the other hand, there was a different standard for women, who were not only expected to perform regular field labor but also housework and childcare. In chapter five, “The Trials of Girlhood”, Jacobs expressed her sorrow at seeing two girls playing together. Two sisters raised by the same mother, except one was white and the other was her black slave. It was extremely common and expected of enslaved women to care for and parent their masters’ children, even if they had their own to look after as well. This began since their infancy, and slaves were also used to breastfeed their owners’ babies, since it was convenient for the masters and allowed the white mothers more mobility ("Exploitation through Reproductive Labor"). While men were physically, laboriously exploited for jobs that required immense strength, which could be dangerous and jeopardize their safety, in addition to common overworking labor, women were expected to act as mother figures and household caregivers. Besides working expectations, though, women were also used in other ways that less commonly occurred to men.
We can recall that a huge part of Jacobs’ struggles revolved around mental and physical abuse and isolation, as well as her status as a conventionally attractive woman. A significant theme that impacted how women were viewed was their sexuality, or “purity”. Virginity was an important label that mostly only mattered for women, which is a double standard that is still relevant in modern-day society as well. Purity culture believes in sexual abstinence as a positive trait; women's involvement in sexual activity is frowned upon and morally shaming. However, enslaved women were often unavoidably and forcibly sexually assaulted, or consequently punished if they refused sexual advances from a man (often their master). As depicted in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, the results of this morally demeaning belief around female sexual status caused unimaginable pains, both physical and mental. Not only were their bodies violated and taken advantage of, but society had also ingrained shame into the women, even if they were not at fault. They were loathed by the men’s wives and looked down on by peers, which risked confidence in their self-worth and challenged emotional stability.
Youth was also viewed as desirable, and many young, black, enslaved women were raped or sexually abused by their masters, viewed as objects that could be employed in common slave labor, but also to fulfill lustful desires or desires for control. Their reproductive organs could be exploited, especially because slavery was inherited, and this could economically benefit the owners. Heavy birthing pressure on women also took a toll on their bodies, and combined with constant labor, enslaved women were subject to seeing the doctors very frequently. Although slaveholders wanted to make the most out of their slaves, they had to keep them alive so as not to lose “property”. Remember, slaves were typically viewed as mere calculations for maximum economic profit, not as humans. Punishments were regularly performed with strategies to avoid accidentally killing the slaves, and also to preserve the women’s reproductive organs. In addition, doctors also viewed enslaved patients as experimental and status-increasing opportunities. The slaves never had a say in how much they were willing to risk themselves for treatment, as their bodies did not belong to them, and so doctors could freely use them for testing to further the development of medicine, as well as gain prestige in their field. Furthermore, the racialization of Black bodies as “strong and robust” caused doctors to overlook Black people’s pain sensitivity, and often didn’t bother to use anesthesia. The exploitation of women’s bodies as a vessel for labor services and an object to be used made them more susceptible than men to severe physical and mental traumas ("Exploitation through Reproductive Labor").
All victims of slavery were unforgivably robbed of their rights and quality of life; however, gender roles played a significant part in how people were treated, causing differences that could strongly affect individual perceptions and opinions. In Booker T. Washington’s writing, he was generously hopeful, as he recalled that everyone, both slaves and slaveowners, was only “victims of the institution”, and held very little resentment from his life as a slave boy. His expressed point of view was molded by his personality and efforts to be favored by wide audiences, but perhaps most importantly, his enslaved experience, in which the duration and severity should be accounted for. Although Washington’s experiences would have naturally differed from the lives of other enslaved people, it was especially less horrific and abusive than those of most women, such as Harriet Jacobs’, whose trials were not uncommonly similar to those of many female slaves at the time. Jacob’s story, while still humbly expressed, showed no signs of forgiveness after the torture she had suffered. Not because she was harsher or less forgivable, but because her writing choices were also shaped by personal experiences. Experiences of incomparable devastation that caused sustained mental and physical damage, due to events primarily resulting from gender inequality and sexual objectification. Both autobiographies were valid in reflecting different slave experiences, but it is important to acknowledge the effect of gender-based treatment and expectations that heavily changed the lives of millions of slaves.
Works Cited
“Exploitation through Reproductive Labor · Hidden Voices: Enslaved Women in the Lowcountry and U.S. South · Lowcountry Digital History Initiative.” Lowcountry Digital History Initiative, ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/hidden-voices/enslaved-women-and-slaveholder/reproductive-exploitation. Accessed 15 Sept. 2025.
Charlotte, I really appreciate your mention of "purity" in Jacobs' autobiography. I found it to be a striking aspect of Jacobs' writing, where the true extent of Dr. Flint's psychological torture through coercion and manipulation was clearly displayed by Jacobs. Do you think that pure control had just as large a role as economic gain in slavery? Jacobs reveals the true nature of Dr. Flint, where there was minimal economic gain compared to the power Dr. Flint felt when he manipulated her.
ReplyDeleteYour consideration of how slaves were treated differently depending on their gender was well-thought out and I appreciate how you tried to not make generalities, acknowledging the abuses female slaves suffered while also not discounting male slave's suffered abuses. I do wonder if this is a fair comparison of different genders in slavery, since Washington wasn't a slave for long, and also suffered considerably less (or downplayed his suffering in order to appease white audiences) than most of his male counterparts. I don't disagree with your point at all--rather, I think perhaps another piece of literature could have better shown the contrast of the differing experiences of the genders in slavery (I also understand that we didn't read any other autobiographies, so you were limited in that respect). Overall, your blog post was insightful and thought-provoking. Good job!
ReplyDeleteGreat post Charlotte! I think it's really important how you contrast the slave narrative from the perspective of a man through Booker T. Washington's autobiography, with a narrative from a woman with experiences similar to many female slaves of her time. I really like how you acknowledge that inherent gender roles play a very important part in how the struggles of slavery were vastly different for men and women, and that male narrative often fail to notice the severity of the treatment of women. Just like you say, it's incredibly important to look at slavery from a female lens as well, to completely understand the gravity of the situation. Great post!
ReplyDeleteHi Charlotte! This blog is so insightful, and I really enjoyed the nuance you brought to the conversation of what modern people might call "Misogynoir." You were able point out the discrepancies between men and women's experience in chattel slavery while not dismissing the experiences of enslaved men, which I appreciated. Additionally, the information you brought in from your secondary source built upon the evidence from our readings really well, so nice job! I don't think you really mentioned this too explicitly in your blog post, but I think that one of the main reasons why intersectionality is so important to talk about is because a person's belonging to two different marginalized groups can be a very lonely experience. For example, in the Black male authors' accounts that we have read, they feel intense rejection and oppression from white society, but the African American community (particularly fellow enslaved people and their families) acts as a safe space for them where they do not face that discrimination. However, in /Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl/, Jacobs faces not only rejection from white society but also from the enslaved community when she becomes pregnant, which I think really highlights the difficulty of Black women's experiences as compared to Black men or white women. Great blog!
ReplyDeleteCharlotte, the way you connected your research on the sexual and reproductive exploitation of enslaved women to our readings was so profound, and the way you highlighted the presence of intense purity culture and shame within Jacobs' writing (a topic I feel that we definitely barely covered at all) was soooooo poignant---- I really think your analysis of these two texts was one of the most piercing, of the whole class. It's really making me think back to "Up from Slavery"--- did Washington mention the experiences of slavery for women a single time? One wonders if he ever even considered the terrifying and potential reality of being a perpetual victim of rape, for Black women during slavery; a lot of people have observed that Washington wasn't a slave himself for very long, in comparison to slavery spanning Jacobs' entire life, but Washington was surrounded by people who had been exploited for much longer, and would have also had access to texts like Jacobs' autobiography. The other most common analysis is that Washington was downplaying slavery for his white audience--- but in light of the tremendous suffering that countless Black people endured, is this not an incredible disservice? I really feel like this blog confronted this dichotomy very well, and I'm beyond impressed. I'm excited to see what you write next!
ReplyDeleteHi Charlotte! Your research into the medical experimentation on slaves was really insightful, and added another layer to the ways slaves, and especially slave women, were exploited, and I wonder just how common/accepted these practices were. The concept of purity and its double standard is still such an important discussion today, so I found your analysis on Jacob's guilt and the misplacement of blame by mistresses in sexual abuse really insightful. Overall, you did a great job with the exploration of intersectionality while acknowledging one struggle doesn't necessarily take away from another struggle as well.
ReplyDeleteHi Charlotte! This article was very well thought out, and I totally agree with all of your points on how the way the experiences of slavery differed for men/women shaped the varying narratives of A Life of a Slave Girl and Up From Slavery. I was wondering if maybe Booker T. Washington's narrative could be a little biased since he mentioned having very nice owners, and how because of his small size he didn't have to do much of the hard physical labor (like you mentioned :). He also didn't experience life in slavery for a while because emancipation happened when he was young. I wonder if his experiences are maybe not as representative of the life in slavery for men because of these differences. Anyways, great job ! I loved this article and am excited for the next.
ReplyDeleteHey Charlotte, your analysis of gender roles during slavery was very insightful and further shows its horrors. You did a really nice job contrasting Booker T. Washington and Jacobs experiences without minimizing the other. Like I mentioned in my own blog, I think compared to other slaves and especially Jacobs, Book's life was not as terrifying and I like the different stance you gave.
ReplyDeleteCharlotte, your insightful interpretation of gender differences in the the experiences of slavery between Booker T. Washington and Harriet Jacobs shows how deeply gender roles shaped the kinds of abuse enslaved people faced. Your reading challenges me to think about how gender itself changed not only what they experienced but how they were able to tell their stories. I wonder if you think Washington faced more abuse that he did not write about in his story.
ReplyDeleteHi Charlotte! I remember that in "Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl," Jacobs herself mentioned that even though everybody in slavery had immense struggles, life as an enslaved woman was harder because of the sexual trauma many endured. I didn't really know that African Americans were often the subject of medical experimentation, which is truly terrible. I'm pretty sure what I'm recalling happened more in the 20th century than in the 19th century, but I remember reading about forced sterilization African American women due to the support of eugenics, which I was reminded of when you made the point about enslaved African Americans unable to control what was happening to their own bodies.
ReplyDeleteI really like your exploration of gender in "Life of a Slave Girl" and "Up from Slavery". (maybe I am biased because this is also what I chose to write about.) I think your comparison of male and female experiences under slavery is effective, showing us the different degree's of dehumanization Jacobs and Washington faced, while still acknowledging the experiences of both. I also appreciate how your dive into the exploitation of black women focuses not only on the aspect of sexual assault and labor, but also in a medical sense, which is a thread that has not been directly brought up in the texts we've read so far.
ReplyDelete